Unforgivable mistakes in the image of the main character
Creating an authentic, appealing to the reader and at the same time original image of the main character is a non-trivial task. It is not easy to solve it without mistakes, but mistakes also vary.
There are those that are easily corrected when editing the manuscript, and there are those that require almost a complete rewriting of the story.
Now we're going to pay for college essay talk about just such mistakes.
In my editing practice, I have most often encountered the following five errors in the main character:
A weak or stupid hero;
a limited/single-tasking hero;
dilettante hero or clueless hero (mistakes in profession or status);
the surprise hero (when the hero turns into a fool or a villain on the spot, breaking the logic of the character);
and the hero of the wrong novel.
The Weak Hero.
There are several reasons why essays for sale an author puts a weak or stupid hero at the center of a narrative. This is a pursuit of originality, and the peculiarities of the genre (for example, social science fiction or dystopia is well tolerated such a technique), and - at times - the requirements of the story itself.
Let's say the author https://payforessay.pro/finance-homework-help/ wants to show a consistent development and/or maturing of the hero, which means that at the beginning you have to show the hero being immature, doing stupid, impulsive or short-sighted things and reasoning at the level of ninth grade school. If the author does it correctly - shows not only the immaturity of the hero, but also his, for example, courage, loyalty to friends, or kindness to our lesser brothers - then the reader will still be indulgent and sympathetic to such a hero.
It is much worse when the author makes the protagonist not only stupid, but also indecisive. When it's not the deeds that are stupid, but only the reasoning, and the actions - at least some of them! - When it does not come to actions, or even any actions at all. In this kind of hero, the reader does not forgive him anything.
If circumstances develop in such a way that the character is forced to act willy-nilly and take something, the reader will evaluate these actions and their consequences without making any conclusions about his indecisive or immature character.
And you get the following dilemma: if the author leads the character, following the logic of the image (weak, indecisive, immature), then he risks irritating the reader because of the hero's stupidity and, consequently, losing part of the readership. And if he "breaks" the character of the protagonist for the sake of the reader's sympathy, he may run the risk of being accused of the unreliability of the character, with the same consequences as in the first version.
The reader nowadays is strict and fastidious 🙂 .